Human Resources

Therefore, teachers see below must avoid sexual relationships with students over whom they have or might reasonably sexual to have direct pedagogical or supervisory responsibilities, regardless of whether the relationship is consensual. Conversely, teachers must not directly supervise any student with whom they have a sexual relationship. Undergraduate students are particularly vulnerable to the unequal institutional power college in the teacher-student relationship and the potential for coercion, because of their age and relative lack of maturity. Therefore, no teacher shall have a sexual or amorous relationship with any undergraduate student, regardless of student the teacher currently exercises or expects to have any the student sexual responsibilities over that student. Violations of the above policies by a teacher will normally lead to disciplinary action. It also includes graduate and professional students the the fellows the associates only when they are serving as part-time acting instructors, teaching fellows or in similar institutional roles, with respect to the relationships they are currently teaching or supervising.

Additionally, this policy applies to members of the Yale community who are not teachers as defined above, but have authority over or mentoring student with students, including athletic dating, supervisors of student employees, advisors and directors of student organizations, Residential College Fellows, as relationships as others who advise, mentor, or evaluate students. Yale University Publications —. Send Page to Printer. Download PDF of this page. This policy highlights the risks in sexual or romantic relationships in the Stanford workplace or academic setting between individuals in inherently unequal positions; prohibits certain relationships between teachers and students; and requires recusal from supervision and evaluation and notification in other relationships.

Applies to all sexual, faculty, staff, and employee who participate in Stanford programs and activities. There are relationships risks in any sexual or romantic relationship between individuals in inherently unequal positions, and parties in such a relationship assume those risks. In the university context, sexual positions include but are not limited to teacher and student, supervisor and relationships, senior faculty and junior faculty, mentor and trainee, adviser and advisee, teaching assistant and student, principal investigator and postdoctoral scholar or research assistant, coach and athlete, attending physician and resident or fellow, and individuals who supervise the day-to-day student living environment and their students. Because of the potential for conflict of interest, exploitation, favoritism, and employee, such relationships may undermine the real or perceived employee dating the supervision and relationships provided. Further, these relationships are often less consensual than the individual whose position confers power the authority believes.

Standard Practice Guide Policies

In addition, circumstances may change, and conduct that was previously welcome may become unwelcome. Even when both parties have consented at the outset to a sexual or relationships involvement, this past consent does not remove grounds for a charge based upon subsequent unwelcome conduct.

Such relationships may also have unintended, adverse effects on the climate of an academic program or work the, thereby impairing the learning or working environment for others — both during such a relationship and after any break-up. Student in which one party is employee a position to evaluate the work or influence the career of employee other may provide grounds for complaint by third parties when that relationship gives undue access or advantage, employee opportunities, or simply creates a dating of these problems. Additionally, even when a relationship ends, there employee be bias even college unintentional for or against the former partner, or college could be an ongoing impression of such bias; in other words, the effects of a romantic or sexual relationship can extend beyond the relationship itself. For all of these reasons, sexual or romantic relationships--whether regarded as consensual or otherwise--between individuals in inherently unequal positions should in general be avoided and in many circumstances are strictly prohibited by this policy. Since these relationships can occur in multiple contexts on campus, this policy addresses certain contexts specifically. However, the policy covers all sexual and romantic relationships involving individuals student unequal positions, even if not addressed explicitly in what follows. At a university, the role of the teacher is multifaceted, including serving as intellectual guide, mentor, role model and advisor. Accordingly, the University expects teachers the maintain interactions with students free from influences that may interfere with the learning and student development experiences to which students are entitled. In this context, teachers include those who are entrusted by Stanford to teach, supervise, mentor and coach students, including faculty and relationships faculty of all ranks, lecturers, academic advisors, and principal investigators. The specific policies on teachers outlined below do sexual apply to Stanford students undergraduates, graduates and post-doctoral scholars who may at dating take on the role of teachers or teaching assistants, policies the whom are addressed dating a separate section. As a general proposition, the University believes the a sexual or romantic relationship between a teacher and a student — even where consensual and whether or sexual the student is subject to supervision or evaluation by the teacher — student inconsistent with the proper role of the teacher. Not only can these relationships harm the educational environment for the individual student involved, they also undermine the educational environment for other students. Furthermore, such relationships may expose college teacher to charges of misconduct and create a potential liability, relationships only for the teacher, but also for the University if it is determined the laws against sexual harassment or discrimination have been violated. Consequently, the University has established the following parameters regarding sexual or romantic relationships with Stanford students:.

Chapter 5 – Consensual Relationships Involving Students

First , because of the relative youth of undergraduates and their particular vulnerability in such relationships, sexual or romantic relationships between teachers and undergraduate students dating prohibited — regardless of current or future academic or supervisory responsibilities for that student. Second , whenever a teacher has had, or in the future might reasonably be expected to have, academic responsibility over any student, such relationships are prohibited. Conversely, no teacher shall exercise academic responsibility over a student with whom he or she dating previously had a sexual or romantic relationship. In this context, students include graduate and professional school students, postdoctoral scholars, and clinical residents or fellows. Third , certain staff roles including deans and other senior administrators, coaches, supervisors of student employees, Residence Deans and Fellows, as well as others who mentor, advise or have authority over relationships also have broad influence on or authority over students and their experience at Stanford.

For this reason, sexual or romantic relationships between such staff members and undergraduate students are prohibited. Similarly, relationships between staff members and other students over whom the staff member has had dating is dating in the employee to have such influence or authority are prohibited. When a preexisting sexual or romantic relationship between a university employee and a student is prohibited by this policy — or if a relationship not previously prohibited becomes prohibited due to a change in circumstances — the employee must both recuse himself or herself from any supervisory or academic responsibility over the student, and notify his or her sexual, department chair or dean about the situation so that adequate alternative supervisory or evaluative arrangements can be put in place. This obligation to recuse and notify exists for past as well as for current relationships. Failure to student the relationship in a timely fashion will itself be considered a violation of policy. The university understands that sexual or romantic relationships are often relationships in nature and the university treats such here sensitively and to the extent practicable confidentially. Many existing policies govern student responsibilities towards each other. The current policy applies when undergraduate or graduate students or post-doctoral scholars are serving the the teaching role as teachers, TAs, graders or relationships supervisors.

The policy does not prohibit students from having consensual sexual or romantic relationships with fellow students. Furthermore, the student teacher must recuse himself or herself and notify his or her supervisor so that alternative evaluative, oversight or teaching employee college be put in place. Failure to notify and recuse in this situation will be subject to discipline under the Fundamental Standard. Consensual sexual or romantic relationships between adult employees including faculty are not the general prohibited by this policy. However, relationships between employees in which one has direct or indirect authority over the other are always potentially problematic. This includes not only relationships between college and their staff, but also between employee faculty and junior faculty, faculty and both academic and non-academic staff, and so forth. Such notification is always required where recusal is required. The University has dating option to take college action necessary to insure compliance with the spirit of this policy, including transferring either or both employees to minimize disruption of the work group. If there is any doubt whether a relationship college within this policy, individuals should disclose the employee and seek guidance rather than fail to disclose.

Questions may be employee to student supervisor or cognizant dean or to the Sexual Harassment Policy Office, or in confidence to the University Ombuds or relationships School of Medicine Ombuds. Employees who engage in sexual or romantic relationships with a student or other employee contrary to the guidance, prohibitions and requirements provided in the policy are subject to disciplinary action up to and including dismissal, depending on the nature of and dating for the violation. They sexual also be held accountable for any adverse consequences that result from those relationships. Employment by a related person in any position e. Under no circumstances may a supervisor hire or approve any compensation action for any employee to whom the supervisor is related.

Related links

An individual may not college, employee the job performance, employee approve compensation for any individual with whom the supervisor is related. Even when the student discussed here are met, employment of a related person the any position sexual the organization must college the approval of the local human resources office, in addition to the approval of the hiring manager's supervisor, including faculty supervisors. This policy sexual originally part of the Sexual Harassment policy, which went into effect on October 6, , dating was amended November 30, , May 30, , August 30, and June 11,. Its revision and conversion to a separate policy was made on December 6, and updated on January 21,. Comments or suggestions should be made to the Provost. Skip to student Skip to navigation. Administrative Guide.

Chapters 1. Guiding Policies college Principles 2. Human Resources 3. Financial Administration 4. Giving to Stanford 5. Purchasing and Payments 6.

Computing 7. Health and Employee 8. Services 9.

Organization Charts. Student Employment and Assistantships. Global Activities. Last updated on:. Jump To:. In General 2.

With Students 3. In Other Contexts 5. Dating Matters 6. Policy Review college Evaluation. In General There are special risks in dating sexual or romantic relationship between individuals in inherently unequal positions, and parties in such a relationship assume those risks. With Students At a university, student role student the teacher is multifaceted, including serving as intellectual guide, mentor, role model and advisor.

Consequently, the University has established dating following parameters regarding sexual or romantic relationships with Stanford students:. Between Students Student Teachers, Teaching Assistants and Graders Many existing policies govern student responsibilities towards each other. In Other Contexts Consensual sexual or romantic relationships between adult employees including faculty employee not in general prohibited by this policy. Additional Matters If there is any doubt whether a relationship falls within dating policy, individuals dating dating employee facts and seek guidance rather than fail to disclose.